Wednesday, January 20, 2016

This book is NOT free: my novel is for sale



To be honest, I’ve always been holding out for hookers. That’s the reason it’s taken 16 years to publish my debut novel, “The Last Baby Boomer: The Story of the Ultimate Ghoul Pool.”
I kept waiting for some prestigious publisher or agent to fly me to Manhattan, limo me to some swanky hotel and say, “Here you go, Mr. Rodell. You can have the blonde, the red head, the brunette or all the above.”
Not wanting to hurt anyone’s feelings I’d, of course, take all three.
Then we’d elevate on up to the penthouse, I’d usher them into the suite and tell them to all lay down on the bed.
Then I’d slowly reach down and pull out …
My copy of “The Last Baby Boomer!”
Yes, I’d host a dramatic reading straight from page 1:
“The line to behold the dying man throbbed and pulsed within 5,000 feet of velvet rope. The crimson tethers were like arteries rushing blood to the center of a very sick heart. The ceaseless multitudes bore the pained expressions of hens consumed with thoughts of trying to lay square eggs. They clutched their $25 tickets and rubbed their good luck charms with urgent impatience. The doomed man’s chain-smoking primary care physician hadn’t scanned a single chart or much less bothered to visit his patient in more than 18 months and remained dogged in his shrill conviction that the patient, Martin Jacob McCrae, would drop dead any second. That’s when all the real fun would begin.”

It is my fact-based prediction that the very last baby boomer will be 115 years old in the year 2079. The satiric book’s premise is that people will be so sick of baby boomers by then they’ll take the last one, put him in a museum suite and charge contestants $25 to be with him for 15 minutes.
If they’re in the room when he dies they win the jackpot.
One problem: He just won’t die. He just keeps living and living and the ghoul pool jackpot keeps rising to preposterous heights.
It’s a coming of old, old age story.
Because everyone has to die.
But only one of us gets to die last.
I sent the first three chapters to an agent named Steve in 2000 and Steve called back right away and said he loved the premise, the writing he described as “crackling,” and insisted I overnight him the finished manuscript.
I clearly remember hanging up the phone and thinking, “Should the Cadillac be black or red?”
He promised he’d get back to me in two weeks.
That was 15 years ago. I’m still waiting.
I called back after a month and asked for Steve.
“Steve’s gone.”
Where’d he go?
“No one knows. He just left.”
I like to think he read the book and was too struck by the genius within to further carry on in adult society.
It was the first frustration in what would become by far the greatest frustration in a life that increasingly seems like a colossal monument to the emotion.
Up until then everything had gone exactly as planned. I’d had an interesting career filled with characters and adventures published by many of the top magazines where I was on friendly terms with all the top editors.
The next logical step for a writer was to publish a novel. And I had mine.
My experience with Steve convinced me I’d chosen a bumpy path. I just had no idea the path would be so goddamned long.
But every rejection — and there’ve been maybe a thousand — included praise and advice to persevere. This from a top agent in 2006 was typical:
“This is one of the most inventive premises I’ve seen this year. And your writing, characters and dialogue are terrific. But I’m afraid this isn’t genre-specific enough for me to try and sell. Just keep pitching. You’ll find the right agent and I’m sure you’re in for great success.”
And every time I’d read a rejection like that another chunk of my soul would evaporate.
Would it be easier to sell if I included a lovesick vampire?
Forlorn, I’d put the thing away for years at a time. Then I’d grudgingly bring it back out, hammer away at it for a month or two and resume my tedious march on the rejection treadmill.
The very worst was in 2012. I’d sent it blind to one of the most exalted agents in the literary world.
And she bit.
She called and gushed all the familiar praise and requested I send the whole thing. She called the next week and said she wanted to set up a conference call with her and her 10 associates.
She was meeting with with European publishers that week. Was I available the Wednesday after that?
Indeed.
The 45-minute call was like a play written by my cruelest friends to tease all my most precious dreams. They’d all read whole book and took turns trying to outdo one another in terms of praise.
“It’s like Kurt Vonnegut!”
“Hollywood is going to eat this up!”
“It’s one of those rare books that as soon as I finished it I was already impatient to read your next book.”
Then the top agent said, “So it’s clear we all think we have a real winner here. Now, we want you to take two years and really get the book in shape.”
Two years? I’d been getting in shape for 10. If it was any more fit it could enter a triathlon.
But there was no way I was going to blow this. I said, sure. Two years. I figured in six months I could tell her I worked around the clock on it and was ready to go.
I emailed her a month later to say how excited I was about the progress and that, hey, in the meantime would she take a look at another finished project that’s getting a lot of positive interest. It’s a novelty self-improvement book with the word “crayons” in the title.
She emailed me back later that day a brusque note that said if I wasn’t fully committed to the novel there was no need in going any further.
It was at that point where, while I’ve never once felt suicidal, I earned a poignant understanding for those who do.
Yet, the only emotion that’s outweighed all the frustration is all the hope.
Because I believe all the praise. I believe people are going to love the book. And I believe that, thanks to “Crayons!” I’m now expert at gorilla marketing, which differs from guerrilla marketing in that for the latter consumers are engaged but for the former they go absolutely apeshit.
I paid $1,500 to self-publish it through iUniverse and shelled out another $2,100 to buy 250 discount copies.
As stated in the headline, this book is NOT free.
So it differs from “Use All The Crayons!” which famously states on page 1, “This Book is Free.” I insisted on including that because I didn’t want anyone who couldn’t afford the book to be without something I felt sure would brighten their lives.
It was very vain, yes, but I was correct. That book and the outlook it espouses makes a lot of people very happy. In three years, I’ve given away more than 500 free copies to petitioners from all over the country. I even pay the postage.
And I’ve sold more than 2,000 copies myself with traditional outlets selling just as many.
Given that the typical self-published book sells just 100 copies, I’m very pleased; it's also led to a fun and potentially lucrative sideline as a motivational speaker. And I still believe one day the book will really take off. People just love it. Honest.
Will they love “The Last Baby Boomer?” I honestly don’t know.
Getting anyone to read anything is a challenge these days.
You can read three sample chapters on the newly revamped and comprehensive www.ChrisRodell.com. Check it out. I’m grateful to Robyn John of Apollo Design and Brian Henry of Evermark Studios for their creativity and cheer. Robyn came up with and designed the evocative cover, too. I love it.
So it’s not free. How much is it?
Amazon is selling it for $16.95; the kindle version is $3.99; prices are the same on Barnes & Noble. I’m hopeful, given how supportive they’ve been with “Crayons!” the chain will stock this one at least in Greensburg. We shall see.
All those outlets give better deals than the one I’m giving.
Buying it from me costs $20 (plus $3 if you need it mailed within U.S.)
I settled on $20 because I prefer round numbers and rounding up makes better fiscal sense than rounding down.
Plus, I’m considering the additional $3.05 a sort of blog tariff for my core readers who’ve been enjoying the blog for free lo these many years. That number, by the way, will next week top 300,000 hits in the three years. Talk about your nice round numbers.
I don’t feel sheepish about the fee because this is more of a product than the crayons book, which always felt like a gift to me. It’s something I want people to have because I know they’ll enjoy it.
It’s so pleasing to have people come up to me and say they don’t read, but they love my book. It makes them happy.
Makes me happy, too.
“The Last Baby Boomer” holds a different kind of value, one that I think warrants the additional fees for a signed and numbered book.
I can’t promise this book will make people happy. I think it will, but I just don’t know.
So please don’t feel compelled to read it.
See, once again I’m going out of my way to prove how I differ from traditional authors who are always harping on you to read their books.
I can’t bring myself to ask that of you. Asking people to read a book just seems so audacious.
But, gee, I’ll sure be grateful if you at least buy it!


Related . . .


Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Reacting to our celeb death epidemic


I know what you’re thinking, ‘cause I’m thinking it, too.
How can Wayne Rogers, David Bowie, Dan Haggerty, Natalie Cole, Glenn Frey and Alan Rickman all be dead when Zsa Zsa Gabor remains so grimly otherwise?
I’ve had ZZG on my ghoul pool since 2011 when I wrote about how her shady “husband” was asking doctors to lop off huge chunks of her once-gorgeous body to prolong her pitiful life. She’ll be 99 on February 10.
But with the sad and surprising passing of Frey, social media grievers are becoming alarmed over what seems like a celebrity death epidemic.
Who’s next? The captain from “Captain & Tennille?” That’d be Daryl Dragon. He’s 73.
All these celebrity deaths put me in the awkward position of mocking many sincere feelings, which is just wrong.
I must have a sentimentality deficit because I rarely mourn when an established celebrity dies of natural causes.
I guess I’d feel otherwise if everyone of us didn’t have to eventually die anyways. Well, everyone but Zsa Zsa, Betty White and — hallelujah — Keith Richards.
In fact, I often feel kind of uplifted at the recollections of their impact on my life.
Take David Bowie. I was never a huge fan and the only recording of his I own is “Under Pressure,” the euphoric duet he does with Freddie Mercury.
His death was a reminder of a truly vibrant life, so artistically aspirational. But I didn’t feel any sadness that he was gone.
Bowie was 69, Rickman 69, Frey 67, Cole 65. Dying below 75 anymore does seem cruel, so that’s a factor.
Most of the Bowie music that moved so many was often too avant guard for me. In fact, the coverage of his death most striking to me was how it seemed he never once left the house without a really great hair cut.
Didn’t he ever have bed head? Heck, I’ve been known to wear a ball cap to Sunday worship.
I think another reason there’s a bug up my rear — fear not, it isn’t fatal — about celebrity grieving is because it increases the chances my irrepressible snark will offend.
It happened on a friend’s Facebook feed. He’d written how he was never a big Bowie fan and didn’t understand the grief tsunami over his death.
I replied facetiously but not without reason that if this is the reaction we’re getting over David Bowie, what will people say when Alice Cooper kicks? After all, many of the adjectives applied to Bowie — ground-breaking, innovative, tuneful — apply as much to Alice as they do to Bowie.
Well, the reaction was like I’d slammed Santa.
I was denounced as a musically tasteless asshole, a provocateur, a dunce. The onslaught made me relieved Facebook is as yet incapable of informing partisans how I smell.
Never saw the Eagles, but I love much of their music, especially “New Kid in Town” and “The Last Resort” and the sublimely poignant, “Sad Cafe.”
Frey, too, seemed like a great guy. He was a staple on the celebrity golf circuit, was cheerful during his interviews. And I like his obscure solo single, “Part of Me, Part of You.”
Maybe mine is a fatigued reaction to how social media amplifies our every emotion. It seems especially pronounced with celebrity death.
I guess I’m more likely to advise in this often tear-filled world to remember the apt Dr.  Seuss quote: “Don’t cry because it’s over, smile because it happened.”
The advice seems particularly precious now that the morning news includes the death of Dallas Taylor, drummer for Crosby Stills Nash & Young who was, speaking of young, just 66.
The start of 2016 is proving tough for fans of classic rock.
They’re not dying in 3s.
They’re dying in 33 and 1/3rds.

Related . . .


Monday, January 18, 2016

An old paperboy delivers his newspaper lament


A younger friend recently asked where my wife and I met. I told him we were working at the local newspaper. And for the first time it dawned on me the story of our romantic coupling will one day soon require further explanation.
Something I’ve cherished nearly my whole life is going away.
And I don’t mean Val (last I checked, at least).
No, today I’m lamenting the apparent and inevitable demise of newspapers.
Many people, especially corporate beancounters, think the solution to declining readership is to make newspapers less like newspapers. They instead cater to people who prefer to get their news digitally.
But what’s even more disappointing is how newspapers are becoming openly hostile to those who enjoy getting home delivery.
It’s not unusual to see front page pictures with cutlines teasing readers to jump to the story — not on an inside page — but to the on-line version with all its tedious distractions.
So they want you to stop reading the paper you paid for and go to site most of them give away for free, the one where none of the industry geniuses have figured out how to earn so much as a dime.
Think I’m kidding?
Just last week the venerable Philadelphia Inquirer (third oldest U.S. newspaper, recipient of 20 Pulitzer Prizes) and its two sister publications were donated — donated! — to the non-profit Institute for Journalism in New Media, part of the Philadelphia Foundation.
So one non-profit is being absorbed by another and at this rate it’s apparent all I have to do to eventually own one of America’s great newspapers is just bide my time.
Did you know my first job was delivering newspapers for the now-defunct Pittsburgh Press?
I had one of the largest routes in the South Hills, 100 daily and 150 Sunday. I was in the 9th grade and making $100 a week; at Christmas I’d earn $500.
I remember thinking, man, if I can get paid this much to deliver the news, how much must they pay the geniuses who write it?”
In my career, I’ve only earned steady newspaper paychecks for five slim years, but I’ve always considered myself a bona fide newsman. I love newspapers and admire the people who put them together.
And I revel in reading a good paper. I savor them. I dart around between sections. I serendipitously discover stories I’d never find on-line.
So it hurts to see them going away or see them pricing themselves to a level that makes me hesitant to purchase. The daily Post-Gazette is now $1.50 a day. I feel like a chump buying it when I know I can get it free on-line.
The pain is particularly acute for me because my Mom feels the same as I do. She must have her daily paper. The problem is she is senile and is merely attached to the idea of getting a newspaper, even though she doesn’t comprehend a word.
“I have to have it to start my day,” she says.
It is her ink-stained security blanket.
And now the (somewhat) more reasonably priced paper, The Tribune-Review (75-cents), has ceased delivery to the 200-unit South Hills apartment where she lives. It’s true. You can no longer get the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review delivered in some places within Pittsburgh.
They say she should read it on-line, this to a woman who often gazes at the TV remote the way the ancients used to gaze at a solar eclipse.
Now I’m looking into ways to pay an exorbitant price to daily deliver a newspaper to a woman no longer mentally agile enough to read it, but feels inexplicably lost when it’s not there.
And newspaper can’t make money with devoted customers like that?
If only I could deliver industry-saving solutions to something that means so much to so many.

Related . . .


Sunday, January 17, 2016

RRS from '11: Custer's last penis


I wrote this in September ’11 and at the time correctly predicted the topic would lead to an onslaught of readers who’d arrive after googling “Custer’s penis.” That’s exactly what happened. A week doesn’t go by without someone somewhere showing up at my blog after typing the “Custer’s penis” search term. It’s not a top 10 story, but probably a top 12. Enjoy your Sunday and … Let’s Go Steelers!”

The topic of General George Armstrong Custer’s penis has been on my mind for several months now. Please don’t take that literally and get that awful image out of your head this instant.

I’ll not change my profile picture to accommodate your lurid imagination.

It’s been there since about March when I finished Nathaniel Philbrick’s “The Last Stand: Custer, Sitting Bull & The Battle of Little Big Horn.”

I’ve been reluctant to address it -- the topic, not the penis -- for several reasons. First, it’s just so unseemly, as patient readers are about to learn.

Second, I know the instant I type “general custer’s penis” into a subject line it may awaken a sleeping automatronic army of Custer devotees who stir when the computer pings over that very subject.

They’re probably all very pleasant and informed people. Certainly, they’re history buffs like myself and we’d no doubt find much agreeable ground to discuss.

But the mutilated penis of a historically inept general is an unsound basis for lasting friendship. I’d much rather engage someone over, say, a shared fondness of Mark Knopfler music.

I tackle the topic now because a part of me that is very dear made what very well could be its last stand three weeks ago.

I am, of course, talking about my hair.

I’ve had long, luscious hair several times in my adult days and it’s always controversial. My many redneck friends, several of them former servicemen, stereotypically tease I’m some sort of sissy.

One joked it looked like I’d enlisted. Really, I asked? What century?

Because the second most enduring memory of the Custer era has to do with military hair. It was everywhere.

It cascaded down their shoulders. It spilled over their lips, cheeks and chins.

It was mostly that way with the mustachioed Custer, too, in 1876, the year he met his doom. Yes, one of America’s most famous and beloved generals could have time traveled a century hence and fit right in on stage with the Village People.

So when did short hair become so synonymous with our servicemen?

The most obvious answer is when the military became more mechanized. Perhaps some long-locked solider got his curls twisted in a Gatling gun. Or maybe it was for sanitary purposes, short hair giving crafty head lice fewer places to hide.

Either way, it’s a pity. Some of the greatest fighting men in literature and history -- Zeus, Samson, Robert the Bruce -- had long hair.

In fact, all the braves who slew Custer at Little Big Horn had what could be called Cher hair.

Yet, these long hairs were often virile and lady-loving men. Take Custer nemesis, Capt. Frederick Benteen, not to be confused with Capt. Benteen from the outstanding 1963 “Twilight Zone” episode, “On Thursday We Leave for Home.”

This Capt. Benteen was a warrior with an artistic bent. From Philbrick’s book: “He loved his wife, Frabbie, intensely and passionately (he sometimes decorated his letters to her with anatomically precise drawings of his erect penis).”

So primitive sexting pre-dated the smart phone by nearly 130 years.

Philbrick is even more emphatic when detailing Custer’s lusts. It turns out the man whose name is most synonymous with American military catastrophe was a serial rapist who repeatedly violated Indian women as the spoils of war.

One of the last quotes attributed to him in the book deals not with military strategy, but of sexual violence: “When we get to the village I’m going to find the Sioux girl with the most elk teeth on her dress and take her along with me!”

The reference goes unexplained, but I’ll bet elk teeth dresses aren’t synonymous with a squaw’s ability prepare a tasty meal.

His reputation for wanton massacre, treaty violation and rape was so renown that two Cheyenne women pierced the ear drums of his lifeless body with long sewing awls in the hopes he’d hear better in the afterlife. How thoughtful.

What I’d never heard before -- and can now never forget -- is those same women jammed an arrow up the general’s penis. The afterlife lesson they were trying to impart there eludes me.

So what are we to make of this man once so beloved by his contemporaries and today reviled by those of us who abhor war crimes and injustice? What would say to his spirit?

I do not know. All I know is we’ll have plenty of time to decide.

We’re bound to see Custer coming from a mile away.



Related . . .






Friday, January 15, 2016

The T-Shirt I inadvertently inspired


It is audacious, I admit, but I believe a lot of the things I write belong on posters, coffee mugs and T-Shirts for inspirational purposes.
Things like:
Enjoy being human and enjoy human beings
Anytime you hear of anyone dying suddenly it ought to reinforce the need to always be living suddenly
And . . .
A mohawk is an eccentric haircut. A MoeHawk is an irrationally angry bird that inflicts cartoon violence on a CurlyHawk.
You know, stuff for the ages.
What happened this week is an example of being careful for what you wish. Because something I’d written is now on a T-Shirt.
And it’s being mass produced.
By mass produced, I mean there are eight of them. That may not seem like much, but given that all but three of them are size Triple XL, I think it qualifies. Either way, it’s a whole lot of fabric.
On the front are cool top-hat wearing skulls with cigars clenched between their ivories. It'd make a dandy prison tattoo.
On seven of them is written “MEMBER.” On the eighth, “PROSPECT.”
Mine is the latter.
On each is the initials for the phrase I now regret coining.
It is CSL. It stands for “Cigar Smoking Lout.”
It’s an offhand line I wrote in an offhand variety post in what can be considered an offhand career. In fact, my entire existence is so entirely offhand it’s surprising I’m physically capable of typing.
Yet, it has become legend.
I was writing (link below) about how I skipped a big cigar smoker night to stay in with my family and watch the “Survivor” finale.
Here’s the exact paragraph: 
“My friends think I spend too much time with my family. My family thinks I spend too much time with cigar-smoking louts. I’m at a point in my life where every decision I make is bound to make at least half of the people who know and love me think I’m a perfect jackass.”

Not bad. It’s funny.

But my cigar-smoking lout friends took offense. Louts?

My dictionary describes “lout” as an “awkward, stupid fellow; boor, oaf.”

They’re my friends, sure, but I defy anyone who sees us out smoking cigars and drinking hootch to paint a more accurate picture.

It ain’t no GQ photo shoot.

And that’s a big part of what I love about it.

The first song on Mark Knopfler’s wonderful new “Tracker” album sums it up exactly. It’s “Laughs & Jokes & Drinks & Smokes.”

Unless you’ve absorbed the song, the lyric might confuse. It’s describing an evening, not an action.

In fact, if anyone asks what I do on my nights out with the CSL it is “laugh and joke and drink and smoke.”

It’s a perfect night.

It’s just what we do. I’m sure you do something similar anytime you’re out with good friends.

I just never dreamed it would lead to something emblazoned on a white T-Shirt for posterity, or until I inadvertently drizzle some mustard down the front making the shirt unpresentable in public.

So now next time we go out for the monthly DiSalvo’s Station smoker it’s planned for us all to wear our CSL shirts.

People will notice. People will ask. We’ll explain. I’ll smile politely. I’ll be horrified by the attention. And I’ll reveal that mine says “PROSPECT” because the “MEMBERS” do not yet deem me worthy of the club I unwittingly had a hand in naming.

Or as Val, my ever-supportive wife, said, “It’ll be like you’re back in high school again and having to worry that the cool kids might beat you up.”

(That never happened, by the way. I WAS the cool kid).

And all the while I’ll be wishing I’d earned such sartorial renown for something more profound, more cerebral, more deft.

Something like . . .

If fans of the Grateful Dead are called Deadheads, what does that make those of us who revere Moby-Dick?

Put that on your T-Shirt and smoke it.


Related . . .





Thursday, January 14, 2016

Who I was hoping would win the jackpot


If you think by me blogging the day after the $1.6 billion drawing means I didn’t win, well, you don’t know me very well.
I blog for free. I enjoy it.
Heck, if I’d win the jackpot I’d probably start blogging three times a day.
The only difference between jackpot me and poverty me would be jackpot me would dictate his thoughts aloud to a shapely secretary while he pranced around the room in a purple velvet robe and spouted his pronouncements with a long-stemmed cigarette holder clenched between his teeth.
I’d need the robe and cigarette holder for affluent imagery and the secretary because, gee, typing is the most tiresome aspect of blogging.
But — sorry to disappoint you — I did not win.
So far the three winners are remaining anonymous. If I was in charge they’d have until lunchtime to come forward or else they’d forfeit.
Anonymity should be a disqualifying factor.
I lay it all out in the “Lottery losers should decide winners” link below. In summary, I say each mega-jackpot should have 10 winners and each should be entered into a “Survivor”-like reality show only with harsher conditions that may or may not include tribal cannibalism.
Then the rest of us get to vote on who’s most deserving.
I’m always rooting for the nut job.
That’s why yesterday I tweeted I was hoping the winner would be Trump.
Imagine the gloating.
I told that to a friend and he said he was rooting for the nation of Greece.
I wonder if any of the presidential candidates from either party bought a ticket or two. It’d be a fun debate question. Of course, the follow-up would be how would they spend the money.
How many votes would it secure if one of the candidates said he or she would donate the entire sum to veterans organizations?
I’d vote for that.
Ellen would have been a fun celebrity winner, but not Oprah. In fact, if I have my numbers straight Oprah should be required to fund the next mega-millions jackpot from what she keeps in her purse.
A friend of mine said if he wins he’d buy the Pittsburgh Penguins, which are currently for sale for $850 million.
I initially liked the idea, but have decided it’s stupid.
Because eventually my friend — any of us — will bring ruin on the team and wind up despised in the city we love. It’s nearly impossible to satisfy home team sports partisans who exhibit more braindead inanity than even political ones.
It’d be better to buy a rival team and announce you’re doing so with the intention of deliberately ruining them and punishing their loutish fans
That would be such gleeful fun. 
Imagine the reaction in Pittsburgh today if you announced you were going to buy the Cincinnati Bengals with the intention of making them the worst team in NFL history. You were going to draft the worst players, bring in despicable felons and make the team a national laughingstock.
Like Cleveland!
They’d hate you in Cincinnati, sure.
But, oh, how they’d love you in Pittsburgh. You’d never pay for another meal or drink again.
I wish I’d have won but I’m one of those naturally contented people who fears so much money would drastically and for the worse alter my happy little life.
I’d rather someone kind and sweet like you, dear reader, had won.
You know, someone who enjoys a really good blog.
Someone who’d spontaneously decide a blog like mine was worth a measly .05 percent stipend from the winnings.
I find greed so distasteful and me and my secretary could squeak by on just $750,000.

Related …