The exclamation point, punctuation’s whoopee cushion, is putting on a tuxedo! It’s appearing in all the classiest places!
And I don’t think I like it one bit!!!
The exclamation point and I have never been really what you’d call chums. I try and inject humor into everything I write. Hell, I try and inject humor into everything I do.
That’s why even life’s most mundane routines, things like attending church and having sex, are more fun with me!
See, there you go. I offered a lame little joke that might be mildly amusing without the -- “Wink! Wink! Nudge! Nudge!” -- of the exclamation point. Instead, an otherwise harmless line becomes as tedious as being stuck in the middle seat next to the obnoxious joker who caps every punchline with a giggly, “Get it! Get it!”
But in another cultural battle I sense I’m bound to lose, I see more and more exclamation points scattered like indelicate little erections throughout the future of my carefully crafted sentences.
Blame Serena Williams.
See, while serious writers like me were shackled to our desks listening to tyrannical English teachers rhapsodize about things like semi-colons, she was off learning the tennis stroke that would earn fame and multiple millions of dollars.
The poor thing.
She never learned that the exclamation point was the -- pick one: Henny Youngman, Pauly Shore, Russell Brand -- of punctuation. It had no place in serious writing. It was promiscuous. It was gaudy. It lacked requisite subtlety.
And, ironically, it wasn’t funny! It wasn’t funny with one exclamation point! And it certainly wasn’t funny with three!!!
That’s why after her profanity (and exclamation point) laced tirade at the U.S. Open, she felt compelled to Tweet her remorse.
Here’s how she began her apology: “Hey guys!!!”
That’s how to punctuate a party invitation, not an apology. Like other celebrity tweeters, she relies on the exclamation point to convey emotions which she is incapable of otherwise expressing.
Of course, serious journalists like those anal retentive sorts at the New York Times are by rigid custom forbidden from doctoring those sorts of sentiments. Same goes for other high profile news organizations. They repeat the tweets word for word, exclamation point for exclamation point.
I’ve been reading The Times for 25 years and I don’t remember ever seeing a single exclamation point in a news column, but -- Shazam!!! -- there were three of giddy goodies romping across the sports section like a Radio City Rockette chorus line.
My first thought was there had to be an morning long meeting about how to deal with the wanton exclamation points, and that at least three copy editors felt honor bound to commit ritualistic hari-kari when the points sashayed into print.
It’s funny, too, that I’m so opposed to exclamation points in print when I’m practically a walking exclamation point.
It’s true.
I never say, “Hey, let’s all skip church today.”
I always say, “Hey, let’s all skip church today!”
It’s never with a sober sense of mournful obligation that I say to the boys, “There’s a big game on tonight. Let’s use that as an excuse to meet at the bar and get drunk.”
Not at all. I say it like this: “There’s a big game on tonight! Let’s use that as an excuse to meet at the bar and get drunk!”
If you’ve ever seen me say that, and I’ll say it three times this week, there’s a storm of confetti flying around my head and the John Philip Sousa march “76 Trombones!” is soundtracking the pronouncement.
But as tweets become more and more common, we’re bound to see more and more exclamation points in print as people point out the level of euphoria they’re feeling that a: they are done with the laundry! b: That the minestrone was delicious!! Or that -- hallelujah -- c: “Dancing w/ Stars” is on in 30 minutes!!!
And the progression just noted is accurate. One exclamation point denotes joy! Two means elation!! Three means pure spiritual rapture!!!
It’s the grammatical equivalent of the discredited Cold War nuclear strategy of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). We’re on track to deploy so many multiple exclamation points that it will soon be impossible to register even poignant emotion in print without putting punctuation’s party hat on every sentence.
And that makes me sad.
Really, really sad!!!
4 comments:
I did enjoy this post, knocking the poor old !
But if that irks, how do you feel about the i replacing I all over the pages of Blogland? Is nothing sacred, I ask myself?
Word verification is ...suffer ... and that warrents a ! if anything does.
Thanks, Jinxsy. I'm always flattered to know you're on board. I can't get too worked up over the i. Next on my list is emoticons!!!
I have been sent here by a friend who lovingly nags me for my frequent use of the 'point'; and whilst enjoying your obvious wit and literary skill I must take mild issue with your assumption that said punctuation denotes joy,elation or rapture. No, no! For me it indicates inflection.
I am giving clues as to how I would deliver my post were I sitting around the dinner table with you, quaffing a fine sav blanc and relating a tale. The difficulty of course is that I know three exclamation points means my blood pressure has tripled and I am gripping the edge of the table, white knuckled and with voice rising to a mock shrill crescendo; others however may not. Perhaps I should provide a 'key' in the side bar? The difficulty, of course, is that the well crafted writing of someone such as yourself is of a completely different genre to Serena's tweets and my posts which are essentially scripted versions of an overly theatrical monologue. Mea culpa!
Nice read though. Thanks!
(spoken with big smile and vocal emphasis)
Okay, Arizaphale. Tell your friend that you're excused. Your note is so sweet and friendly, I give you carte blanche to use as many E.P.s as you want!
And you make some good, er, points. I do tend to use them in correspondence because I want people to know I trend toward the silly.
Thanks so much for taking the time to write. You win the award for earthling who's traveled the greatest e-distance to flatter me little brain doodles.
I hope you'll stop by again.
Best,
Chris R.
Post a Comment